Otto Virtanen vs Pavel Kotov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kotov has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 49.55% of points compared to Virtanen's 47.63%. Could this give Kotov an advantage in crucial moments? It seems likely.
• When it comes to returning games, Kotov again leads, securing 46.31% of his opponent's second serve points against Virtanen's 43.28%.
• Under pressure, Virtanen has a better record, saving 62.87% of breakpoints, surpassing Kotov's 57.78%. Will this resilience help him on critical points?
• Virtanen has shown better performance overall in the past year, winning 46.94% of his matches compared to Kotov's 29.41% win rate.
• Both players excel on indoor hard courts, but Virtanen boasts a 70% career win rate, slightly better than Kotov's 65%.
• Kotov has more experience on the main tour, winning 37.5% of his matches, while Virtanen competes more in Challenger/ITF events with a 60% success rate.
• In head-to-head encounters, they are tied, having won one match each, but Kotov won their most recent clash at the Stockholm Open.
• Past matches have averaged 1 hour and 34 minutes in duration, indicating a tight competition between these two.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Kotov has a slight advantage, having a 54% win rate in such situations over the past year, compared to Virtanen's 53%.
• Both players have equal 0% in tiebreak wins against each other, suggesting that tiebreak performance may not be a decisive factor here.
• Kotov has faced higher-ranked opponents in the last 12 months, with an average opponent rank of 148.18, highlighting his experience against tougher competition compared to Virtanen's 164.08.
• Currently, Kotov converts 35% of breakpoints, slightly better than Virtanen's 31.91% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Kotov and Virtanen promises to be a close contest, given their recent performance statistics and head-to-head history.

Kotov has shown a slight advantage in second serve points and return stats, which could prove crucial in tipping the balance in his favor during critical match moments.

Virtanen, however, displays a stronger ability to save breakpoints and has performed better overall in the past year, suggesting his improved form and resilience.

Their career records on indoor hard courts are similar, though Virtanen possesses a marginally better win percentage, indicating his comfort and competence on this surface.

While Kotov has encountered tougher opponents, potentially enriching his experience, Virtanen's proficiency in lower-tier tournaments is noteworthy.

Considering these factors, Kotov’s recent head-to-head victory and his greater experience against higher-ranked players slightly edge him as the favorite to win this upcoming match.